 | | Re: An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX —Bryan Bonahoom
|
| | | (...) Well - I am not thrilled with your references to the train as "el cheapo". Lego is a company that has to make money (the whole point of a company). They are making new trains in a direction that will make the train more affordable to a larger (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX —Christian Treczoks
|
| | | | (...) Well, the term was not my idea, several people in this very newsgroup invented this more or less simultaneously, and, as the new gauge is designed to be chaeper than the other gauge, they are not totally wrong, are they? (...) That would be (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX —Bryan Bonahoom
|
| | | | (...) Since your post calling the train "el cheapo" was on the robotics forum when I found it (and I don't normally hag out on the train forum), I am in the dark about the origination of the term. The new train was not designed to be "cheaper" - (...) (19 years ago, 24-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX —Bryan Bonahoom
|
| | | | (...) Correction: These terms are NOT the same as cheap. (19 years ago, 24-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
