Subject:
|
Re: An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Aug 2005 01:05:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2596 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.trains, Christian Treczoks wrote:
> Well, the term was not my idea, several people in this very newsgroup
> invented this more or less simultaneously, and, as the new gauge is
> designed to be chaeper than the other gauge, they are not totally wrong,
> are they?
Since your post calling the train "el cheapo" was on the robotics forum when I
found it (and I don't normally hag out on the train forum), I am in the dark
about the origination of the term.
The new train was not designed to be "cheaper" - which implies that it is more
fragile, less reliable, etc. - it was designed to be "more affordable" or "lower
cost". These terms are the same as cheap.
Bryan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: An idea concerning the new RC trains and a new RCX
|
| (...) Well, the term was not my idea, several people in this very newsgroup invented this more or less simultaneously, and, as the new gauge is designed to be chaeper than the other gauge, they are not totally wrong, are they? (...) That would be (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|