 | | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview —Rick Clark
| | | | In lugnet.trains, James Seibert wrote: <snip> (...) Actually, Jake already delivered on this request, although in a sneaky way. It was Jake who (strongly?) suggested to the set designers that set #7045, Hovercraft Hideout (URL) would greatly benefit (...) (20 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | | (...) Ya, every time someone trashes Jake for not looking out for us, I remember that set. Pretty slick move. So slick, I'm willing to forgive Jake for finagling his own minifig. (URL) or (URL) WHO can POSSIBLY say that isn't a minifig Jake??? (20 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview —Johannes Koehler
| | | | | | | Hello! (...) I have to say! I'm shocked. Jake, I didn't know you would.... (URL) me, I'm a link!>> Bye Jojo (URL) (20 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.fun, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | | | (...) He was a lot(1) younger then! And perhaps wiser???(2) 1 - OK, not a LOT younger, I think I've been getting TRAINS longer than he's been alive! 2 - Different chemical dependency. I keep telling my wife that a drug addiction would be more (...) (20 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.fun, lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: 10170 TTX Intermodal Double-Stack Car Preview —James Seibert
| | | | | (...) <snip> (...) No, its not bad. I have several of those for that same purpose. Sometimes I wonder if designers are being kind and designing sets with dual purpose uses for some of the parts. Kind of like like buying SW sets and using the (...) (20 years ago, 4-May-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| | | | | | |
