 | | Re: Stupid question about modern passenger service in U.S. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) It may have been a shipper inspection train, or an excursion, those are both not "scheduled revenue intercity" service and thus not subject to the provisions of the Amtrak legislation. (...) As Frank said, no, not intercity. The deal made with (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Stupid question about modern passenger service in U.S. —James Wilson
|
| | | | | Thanks, Larry, and everyone else. I'm not sure what I saw - several matching passenger cars with an F-class locomotive in the same livery. Seems like I used to occasionaly see a UP or SP passenger train when I lived in Austin, too. Probably private (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Stupid question about modern passenger service in U.S. —Steven Barile
|
| | | | FYI there is also a "ski train" running from Denver into the Rockies that is painted the D&RGW colors. Of course that falls into the excursion catagory, but must be a site to see! (URL) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Stupid question about modern passenger service in U.S. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) that D&RGW was a late entrant into Amtrak, as it was run by them for a while and was a money maker for them. I'm not up on the history of it and whether they still run it or whether an excursion company does, or what. (20 years ago, 29-Mar-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
