To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 23781
23780  |  23782
Subject: 
Re: New British Class 50 'Hoover' in Large-Logo Blue Livery
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Thu, 2 Dec 2004 20:53:24 GMT
Viewed: 
1745 times
  
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote:
   In lugnet.trains, Mark Bellis wrote:
   Here’s a new British loco in 8mm:1ft scale.

<snip>

Very nice, Mark. Big! :-d~~

I have a question about the scale. It appears to be 8 wide, which would imply to me to be more like 6.4mm:1ft. Are you going solely by track gauge for scaling, or width of the loco? I would guess that that loco you’ve built prototypically is around 10 feet wide; wouldn’t a loco built in 8mm:1ft in LEGO be ten studs wide? (which would be 1 stud = 1’)

Just curious and always looking to engage the enlightened;-)

JOHN

Big...and reliable!

I go primarily by track gauge, which at 37.66mm is as near to 8mm:1ft or 1 stud:1ft as 16.5mm track is to the HO scale of 3.5mm:1ft.

The British loading gauge is smaller than the US one. The maximum width (of the W6 gauge from 1968) is 9’3”. The actual maximum width of a Class 50 loco is 9’ 1.25”, but 9-wide is just as difficult as 5-wide for 6-wide modellers or 7-wide for 8-wide modellers, so I use a basic body width of 8 with the option of handrails and grilles protruding beyond that. If I think it’s necessary to widen a particular model I can revise it later - the great advantage of using Lego! Perhaps when jumpers in all colours are available from S@H!

If this engine were in 8-wide scale, the correct length would be 57 studs. The length here is a 66-stud body plus buffers for a 68’5” engine. There’s quite a difference in length between 8-wide and 8mm scale!

If I were building US trains, a boxcar is 10’5” wide, so I’d use a 10-wide body plus trimmings.

I usually make the length more accurate, to the nearest foot, since an odd length is easier to cope with than an odd width. Besides that, the overhang on these locos is greater than scale because the bogie centres are where the motor pins are, which is nearer the end of the loco than the actual positions. Therefore it’s useful to save 0.5 stud of width. I think I usually have to build the fuel tanks slightly too shallow in order to clear feed wires and switch lever frames. I already use gear racks instead of the yellow levers on motorised switches to allow more overhang clearance:



Some off-the-shelf models in other scales are less accurate than that (e.g. the Bachmann ‘OO’ Class 37 diesel loco is too short), so I’m allowed 6” here or there :-)

I’m surprised there isn’t a greater following in 8mm:1ft scale Lego trains, since that’s closest to the track scale. The extra hurdles (space out curves with straights, articulate bogies, double up motors) are not that difficult to overcome, apart from the space required!

It was back in 1996 that I first thought “surely real trains are wider than this?” and did the first experiments with my 12V track. Over 8 years I’ve built up quite a shed-load of engines :-) and spent oodles on changing to 9V and building two exhibition layouts (16’x12’ and 8’x6’). My plans are even more ambitious - fully scenic 16’x12’ looped-eight double track layout with prototypical slopes and fiddle yard under the station.

I’m experimenting with US prototypes, and I have some 8mm scale engines under construction: A Santa-Fe F7 (10-wide body, 2 motors); a northern 4-8-4 with model team wheels and full valve gear; and a 3-bogie BBB-wheeled Shay with working transmission. Sadly, completion of these is not expected any time soon! 8mm:1ft scale is great for trying to put in the technical working details that just don’t fit in smaller scales.

Also curious and always looking to enlighten the engaged ;-)

Mark



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New British Class 50 'Hoover' in Large-Logo Blue Livery
 
(...) <snip> Very nice, Mark. Big! :-d~~ I have a question about the scale. It appears to be 8 wide, which would imply to me to be more like 6.4mm:1ft. Are you going solely by track gauge for scaling, or width of the loco? I would guess that that (...) (20 years ago, 2-Dec-04, to lugnet.trains, FTX)

6 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR