Subject:
|
Re: pbForth Does DCC!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:44:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1785 times
|
| |
|
|
My project is along a quite different track, I am attempting to create the DCC
control packets with a PC sound card feeding an 'H' bridge power booster.
I think my hardware is finished as I have checked it far as I can using an
osciloscope but I have a long way to go with the software.
Regarding the question of sensors, considering that the big advantage of DCC is
that we do not need to develop complicate wiring networks for driving the DCC
devices it would be neat if we could monitor the sensors within the DCC wiring
too.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: pbForth Does DCC!
|
| (...) Oh I see what you mean - and I agree with john that there's no real need for multiple channels. (...) Well I was thinking of relatively simple slave units, but with the ability to operate various devices when they receive appropriate DCC (...) (21 years ago, 30-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
