Subject:
|
Re: 10128 or 10028?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 3 Jul 2003 12:31:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
816 times
|
| |
|
|
My bets are on that it was probably just a flub. I'm rather curious to see what
those other 100 sets are... Anyone know?
-Stefan-
In lugnet.trains, Kenneth Wright wrote:
> I was wondering the same thing. LEGO S@H has it as 10128, which
> I'll take as being the official set number - until it changes
> again. Does anybody know why this happens?
> -Ken
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 10128 or 10028?
|
| "Stefan Garcia" <sastrei@netscape.net> wrote in message news:HHG848.1wCG@lugnet.com... (...) see what (...) I don't know what the other 100 set numbers are but I do know why the mixup was made on the new Level Crossing. When Jake sent me the (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 10128 or 10028?
|
| I was wondering the same thing. LEGO S@H has it as 10128, which I'll take as being the official set number - until it changes again. Does anybody know why this happens? -Ken (21 years ago, 3-Jul-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
