Subject:
|
Re: PCC (was Re: Success at Pleasanton GATS
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 04:02:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
995 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
> That's because you can't defy the laws of physics, Captain [1]; the wheels
> *must* be shrouded....
Actually.... no, they don't need to be, Ensign Decker.
Some are some aren't, and running the truck without any sideframe at all is
not a bad approximation, actually.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: PCC (was Re: Success at Pleasanton GATS
|
| (...) I agree about the omission of the motor sideframes-- that's a given. It's just that the MOC sits so high on the trucks, it makes for one interesting first step on or off the trolley;-) Avoiding that problem building 8 wide is hard enough, let (...) (22 years ago, 5-Dec-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: PCC (was Re: Success at Pleasanton GATS
|
| (...) That's because you can't defy the laws of physics, Captain [1]; the wheels *must* be shrouded.... When will you learn that you can't "grand right and left" with a 1 armed square dancer? -John [1] even money on James Mathis, though;-) (22 years ago, 4-Dec-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
