To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 17995
17994  |  17996
Subject: 
Re: Canadian National SD40-2 Diesel Engine V2
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 18:42:48 GMT
Viewed: 
1348 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes:

If it was anyone else posting the above I'd let it go.. or just post a "yep,
well said" because most of the points are valid. BUT, since apparently J2 is
identifying himself as a nitpicker, I have to point out that there is almost
certainly a prototype for a 6 axle (as built locomotive) on 4 axle trucks...
somewhere.

Interesting challenge.  I would be willing to bet that there isn't an example
for the reasons you stated and others.  It would certainly *look* odd, with
large gaps from truck to steps and so on.  Let's bet lunch on it and keep an
eye out for one:-)

I am going to retract a bit on my rant about wheel configuration here.

Say someone wants to model a famous locomotive like Thomas.  We all know Thomas
had 3 axles, but do we really need to give him 6 wheels to create an MOC that
says "Thomas"?  I don't think so.

Likewise, a few years ago John Gerlach of the GMLTC modeled a famous
streamlined steam engine on the Milwaukee Road which pulled the Hiawatha.
Although the actual engine he was modeling was a Hudson (4-6-4 wheel
configuration), he used a 4-4-4 in his MOC.  Even though his wheel
configuration was technically incorrect, it was obvious to a trainhead, through
coloration and other details, what John was actually modeling.

So I would say that if there are other distinguishing characteristics of an MOC
that identify it as a particular prototype, than wheel configuration may be
less important an indicator (if your only intent is to generally model a given
prototype).

But then of course you leave yourself open to the criticism of the *real* rivet
counters;-)

-John



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Canadian National SD40-2 Diesel Engine V2
 
(...) Actually the Hiawathas were 4-4-2 Atlantic types, so John wasn't that far off... (URL) (...) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Canadian National SD40-2 Diesel Engine V2
 
(...) If it was anyone else posting the above I'd let it go.. or just post a "yep, well said" because most of the points are valid. BUT, since apparently J2 is identifying himself as a nitpicker, I have to point out that there is almost certainly a (...) (22 years ago, 10-Oct-02, to lugnet.trains)

35 Messages in This Thread:















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR