Subject:
|
Re: Max. Track Slope
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 02:59:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
344 times
|
| |
|
|
When I first tried to build my own ramps, I just followed much of the
suggestions mentioned by Ross (way back in 1996!). Track Designer can help
you out when planning it. Again, if you follow a 2 plates per rail (2ppr)
grade, you should not have any problems but I generally build mine with a
start of 1ppr for the first eight rails then move to 2ppr. Didn't build much
in the way of ramps last year (working on it) but my 2000 layout was a good
one:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=29055
OK, so it was bit of an overkill.
Adr.
"Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message
news:Gs808E.2I0@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.trains, Ahui Herrera writes:
> > I'm working on a new layout and want to have a track line that goes
> > 'underneath' my table like a subway. Has anyone done something like this
> > before? I'm interested to know what the max. slope is that I can have on
> > the up-ramp before the train (engine and 3-4 cars) will NOT make it up • the
> > slope.
>
> There's some good info here http://www.ngltc.org/train_depot/inclines.htm
>
> > I'm under the assumtion the that down-slope can be as step as the
> > tracks can handle since this won't put a strain on the engine. Is this
> correct?
>
> Not necessarily. If there's a curve on the slope, or right at the bottom, • the
> train will be going too fast to take the turn when it gets to the bottom.
>
> ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Max. Track Slope
|
| (...) There's some good info here (URL) I'm under the assumtion the that down-slope can be as step as the (...) correct? Not necessarily. If there's a curve on the slope, or right at the bottom, the train will be going too fast to take the turn when (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
