 | | Lowest (legit) number yet proudly enters service in the UK :-)
|
|
A1013 arrived today, along with A1036, not yet built. (URL) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: No. A0001 has been registred (Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry)
|
|
(...) ngltc home page is fine. -- Tony Hafner www.hafhead.com www.pnltc.org (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: No. A0001 has been registred (Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry)
|
|
(...) As of 11:15 on Feb 22, the registry page does nto appear under Netscape 4.76 under Windows. The asp won't load. Is this done by design? Paul S (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 limited to 10000 sets or not?
|
|
(...) He said "Decent" not "Cute"... every club should have a Thomas(tm) but that doesn't mean I want LEGO(r) to dump effort into licensing it. Na, give us an A4 Mallard(1) (think of the compound curved pieces for that one!!!) 1 - check me on that, (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 limited to 10000 sets or not?
|
|
(...) Heck yeah, a whole line of them (read: Thomas) -John (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10020 limited to 10000 sets or not?
|
|
(...) Personally, I don't think 10000 is all that limited. I mean, even after Larry's placed his order[1] there'll still be plenty to go around. What production run would you expect of a set like this? I'm not a huge fan of forced 'collectibility', (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: No. A0001 has been registred (Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry)
|
|
(...) I thought it smelled a little odd. I was not sure, so I did not want to make any accusations... Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: No. A0001 has been registred (Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry)
|
|
Yeah, I guess someone thinks they're being funny. Since that's not Brad's email and he lives in New York. (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Metroliner question
|
|
(...) High School Physics: To get the same efficiency from DC, we'd literally need a power station in every district of a city/town. Despite that, AC power distribution is High Voltage/Low Current (was DC the same?) as this ensures low power losses (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Buffers
|
|
Using the responses, I've been able to check out the sets on Brickshelf; I'm not surprised I missed them first time round! Judging by the lack of other train related pieces in the box, I guess they are likely to have been sold as the single items (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | No. A0001 has been registred (Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry)
|
|
I noticed No. A0001 has been registred: (URL) A "James J. Trobaugh" <james@ngltc.org> wrote in message news:GrspzI.ow@lugnet.com... (...) special (...) list. (...) how (...) purely (...) the (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: The wonderful Blacksmith Shop: Open Letter to Dan
|
|
I got mine yesterday, knew I was going to be very happy, right from seeing the beautiful box art (was expecting the half-disappointing black & white/gray "legends" style). Enjoyed putting it together - but the real seal of approval came from my 4 (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.build.military, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: wow - brickswest 2002
|
|
(...) Well, I was only able to attend for a few hours on Saturday, and I must say, that was some of the best few hours I've had in a long time! I finally got to see some of the creations I've been ooohing and awwing at over the past few years (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.events.brickswest, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Metroliner question
|
|
You may be correct, as I really have never seen or studied the systems of which we are referring. My aspects were only mere assumption. I base my hypothesis on a bit of history from the Edison era. In his thriving days of supplying power to the (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Metroliner question
|
|
(...) Well, the electric buses in San Francisco share one of their wires with the historic trolleys along Market St. I'm pretty sure the trolleys are D/C, or the tracks would represent a shock hazard, yes? --Bill. (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: I've got mine!!!
|
|
(...) right corner, making this picture seem like something for LEGO's advertising. I suggest selling them this picture. :) -Bryan (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Santa Fe Super Chief Train Engine Registry
|
|
You're just trying to make work for me aren't you John? :) The only problem with setting the Registry up so that you can update your information is that I would have to have some kind of login system so I know it's you changing your stuff. Maybe I (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: I've got mine (too)!!!
|
|
(...) To answer your question is ...yes... LEGO got permission to use and produce the stickers of BNSF logo. I am not sure what deal was made. And I believe BNSF wants or would like to sell the set in their company store for BNSF employees. Also (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: I've got mine (too)!!!
|
|
(...) It varies. If you read rec.models.railroad you will find that some lines are quite willing to work with hobbyists (Norfolk Southern, for example) and others are quite tight (Union Pacific, for example)... which is why I say in my MTW-2001 (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: I've got mine (too)!!!
|
|
(...) From what I've heard/read, Santa Fe will be allowed to sell the model in their gift shops. I'll bet that was the deal made... Dean (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
