Subject:
|
Re: 10020 limited to 10000 sets or not?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:01:58 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
john@tcltcAVOIDSPAM.org
|
Viewed:
|
2209 times
|
| |
|
|
Mark Rideout wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, Ahui Herrera writes:
> > I just finsihed the transcitps the of Q&A with Brad Justin at Brickswest.
> > On the question of 10,000. This is what he said.
> >
> > Question 39: How limied (on train engine) is limited?
> >
> > Answer: "It's a seriesm of 10,000. We run out of the numbered ones at
> > 10,000 and then will we see how it goes."
> >
> >
> > ***************
> > From my understand of this I'm taking it that if the demand for engines
> > after the first 10,000 is still high they might make more but these next
> > 'batch' MAY NOT be numbered! Anyone else at brickswest want to comment on
> > this. -AHui
>
> That is how I also heard it. My interpretation was that *IF* any more were
> produced, they would not be numbered (this was not implied one way or
> another, just my interpretation\opinion.)
I understood it as Mark did. Personally, after 10,000, I rather see a
*different* engine run of 10,000 and have the Super Chief go out of production
for a while (based on the fact that LD can only have so many different sets in
production at any given time)
-John(#2) ;-)
>
>
> -Mark (#2)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: 10020 limited to 10000 sets or not?
|
| (...) The sooner a LEGO Direct item becomes unavailable, the sooner that item begins to show up on eBay at inflated prices. Isn't that one of the things LEGO Direct was supposed to help stop? I am personally against any sort of 'Limited Edition' (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | Re: 10020 limited to 10000 sets or not?
|
| i agree with this sentiment. in my mind limited edition in the case of the super chief is a short production run of 10,000 and NO MORE. what's the point of having a LIMITED EDITION if only a second run is going to be made with the only difference (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 10020 limited to 10000 sets or not?
|
| (...) That is how I also heard it. My interpretation was that *IF* any more were produced, they would not be numbered (this was not implied one way or another, just my interpretation\opinion.) -Mark (#2) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
36 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
