Subject:
|
Re: image sizes on Brickshelf
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:25:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
998 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Steve Barile writes:
> After looking at Ben's pictures I had a question for everyone. I find it
> difficult to take in the entire picture when I have to scroll. I was
> wondering if anyone else had any feelings about what the optimal size pic is
> to post (on say, Brickshelf).
>
> Also, I just discovered that if you click on the image in Internet Exploder
> (oh, Explorer) it automatically resizes the image to fit the window.
>
> SteveB
Since I've done ALOT with HTML, websites,& Image resizing...
Irfanview is awsome for resizing, But I only use it for oddball sizing, I
Use Paper Port for scanning,& changing formats, & Microsoft Picture It, for
normal thumbnails, & pics. Picture It has only 3 image sizes, "thumbnail"
"quater screen" & "half screen", "half screen" is near a normal picture
size. It also allows for 3 quality settings, Fastest, Better, & Best
(slowest). The best option for large pics, 800x600... Is "compressing".
Compressing forces the picture to download faster, I've used Adobe Photoshop
for this at school, but Adobe is expensive, & huge... I belive Irfanview
does this, correct Steve?
Yes there is a HTML tag that will resize, but the picture STILL takes along
time to load, sometimes longer then its normal. The tag is inserted intothe
image tag:
<IMG SRC="...jpg/.gif" height=65 width=100>(my common thumbnail resizing...)
Josh
Hancock High Wood Shop (My school work...):
http://www.hancock.k12.mi.us/high/art/wood/index.html
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: image sizes on Brickshelf
|
| (...) gah! that's a terrible thing to do, IMO. not only you force people to download the huge picture, just to see it as 100x65, but you use up their cpu to resize it, every time anyone hits the page... instead of just resizing them once yourself, (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.publish.html)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | image sizes on Brickshelf
|
| After looking at Ben's pictures I had a question for everyone. I find it difficult to take in the entire picture when I have to scroll. I was wondering if anyone else had any feelings about what the optimal size pic is to post (on say, Brickshelf). (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
