Subject:
|
Re: image sizes on Brickshelf
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:49:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
910 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Steve Barile writes:
> After looking at Ben's pictures I had a question for everyone. I find it
> difficult to take in the entire picture when I have to scroll. I was
> wondering if anyone else had any feelings about what the optimal size pic is
> to post (on say, Brickshelf).
Good point. I've uploaded some whoppers in the past too, usually when I'm
rushed. But I'd tend to say no more than screen size (1024x768 or maybe even
800x600 or even 640x480) unless you really WANT people to have to pan and
scan to capture all the detail...
>
> Also, I just discovered that if you click on the image in Internet Exploder
> (oh, Explorer) it automatically resizes the image to fit the window.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | image sizes on Brickshelf
|
| After looking at Ben's pictures I had a question for everyone. I find it difficult to take in the entire picture when I have to scroll. I was wondering if anyone else had any feelings about what the optimal size pic is to post (on say, Brickshelf). (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
