To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 14748
14747  |  14749
Subject: 
Re: image sizes on Brickshelf
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Mon, 28 Jan 2002 18:10:43 GMT
Viewed: 
970 times
  
John Gerlach wrote:

In lugnet.trains, Steve Barile writes:
After looking at Ben's pictures I had a question for everyone. I find it
difficult to take in the entire picture when I have to scroll. I was
wondering if anyone else had any feelings about what the optimal size pic is
to post (on say, Brickshelf).

I usually go for the 'low end', and size my pictures to around 640x480.  If
someone asks for a more detailed image of something, I'll either go
full-size, or try to crop down to just what they want to see.

I've got a 3.3megapixel camera, so if I go 'full size' they become some
rather large images!

I'm in the low end camp. For most things, a 640x480 image is plenty,
especially if you crop it. I will go up to 800x600 or even 1024x768, but
I much prefer to keep them small. Of course I'm still running a 33k
modem so large images are a concern. It's real silly when I have to
scroll an image at home (where I run 1600x1200). Such a large image is
only useful to a small number of folks who will print the image, or have
a gargantuan screen.

It would be neat if Brickshelf could autogenerate the smaller images and
give you a choice of viewing original size or restricted size. Of course
Brickshelf would either have to do it on the fly, or only have one
"restricted size". The way I would imagine it is to perhaps use 800x600
as a maximum size, images larger than that would have a smaller image
generated at 1/2, 1/3, or 1/4 (or more) original size such that the
smaller image is no larger than 800x600.

This would be good for the instruction scans also.

--
Frank Filz

-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: image sizes on Brickshelf
 
(...) I usually go for the 'low end', and size my pictures to around 640x480. If someone asks for a more detailed image of something, I'll either go full-size, or try to crop down to just what they want to see. I've got a 3.3megapixel camera, so if (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.trains)

15 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR