 | | Re: Gray VS. Black Metroliner Nose —John Neal
|
| | | (...) heehee....touche:-) -John (23 years ago, 28-Oct-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Gray VS. Black Metroliner Nose —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | (...) No, touchy :-) Anyway, here's a real engine (since improved... more pics later): (URL) J Railton (23 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Gray VS. Black Metroliner Nose —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Ooh... that's cute. I especially like how you worked the letters and gold trim into the tender side. Very nice work indeed. Can't wait for more pics. But please note, I DID say "that's cute" not "that's a big brawny beefy serious engine you (...) (23 years ago, 29-Oct-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Gray VS. Black Metroliner Nose —Tim David
|
| | | | (...) <snip> (...) I'd actually say that WAS a brawny beefy loco (i know thats not what you mean larry!) I think that british locos (both steam and diesel/electric) are harder to reproduduce because they have all their pipework etc hidden away, thus (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Gray VS. Black Metroliner Nose —Jason J. Railton
|
| | | | (...) Thanks for the compliments, Larry and Tim. I'll do some more pictures when I get some time. I've got a cheap camera, so I need to experiment to get good lighting. Tim's right, it's hard to capture the character of trains like this through (...) (23 years ago, 31-Oct-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
