Subject:
|
Re: Language for the 6-wide vs. 8-wide battle/debate
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Jul 2001 23:52:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
960 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.trains, Harvey Henkelman writes:
> > This may be my most stupid post ever, but starting now I will write 6 and 8
> > wide as 6W and 8W respectively, anyone agree with this one?-Harvey
>
> I agree that you said that. But since I don't see this as a battle or debate
> (or even a dichotomy if I can borrow from Dave vs. Dave over on .debate) I
> am not sure that introducing new terminology is *necessary* except maybe as
> a way to have more fun or something.
>
> In fact, I was running an 8 wide on my basement floor last nite. You've all
> seen pictures of it too.
Does this
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/RoscoHead/trains/4561alt/001front1.jpg
count as 8W???? 8?)
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Language for the 6-wide vs. 8-wide battle/debate
|
| (...) I agree that you said that. But since I don't see this as a battle or debate (or even a dichotomy if I can borrow from Dave vs. Dave over on .debate) I am not sure that introducing new terminology is *necessary* except maybe as a way to have (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
