To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 12118
12117  |  12119
Subject: 
Re: Language for the 6-wide vs. 8-wide battle/debate
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Thu, 5 Jul 2001 20:45:06 GMT
Viewed: 
352 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Harvey Henkelman writes:
This may be my most stupid post ever, but starting now I will write 6 and 8
wide as 6W and 8W respectively, anyone agree with this one?-Harvey

I agree that you said that. But since I don't see this as a battle or debate
(or even a dichotomy if I can borrow from Dave vs. Dave over on .debate) I
am not sure that introducing new terminology is *necessary* except maybe as
a way to have more fun or something.

In fact, I was running an 8 wide on my basement floor last nite. You've all
seen pictures of it too.

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Language for the 6-wide vs. 8-wide battle/debate
 
(...) Does this (URL) as 8W???? 8?) ROSCO (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Language for the 6-wide vs. 8-wide battle/debate
 
This may be my most stupid post ever, but starting now I will write 6 and 8 wide as 6W and 8W respectively, anyone agree with this one?-Harvey (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR