To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 12109
    Language for the 6-wide vs. 8-wide battle/debate —Harvey Henkelman
   This may be my most stupid post ever, but starting now I will write 6 and 8 wide as 6W and 8W respectively, anyone agree with this one?-Harvey (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)
   
        Re: Language for the 6-wide vs. 8-wide battle/debate —Larry Pieniazek
   (...) I agree that you said that. But since I don't see this as a battle or debate (or even a dichotomy if I can borrow from Dave vs. Dave over on .debate) I am not sure that introducing new terminology is *necessary* except maybe as a way to have (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)
   
        Re: Language for the 6-wide vs. 8-wide battle/debate —Ross Crawford
   (...) Does this (URL) as 8W???? 8?) ROSCO (23 years ago, 5-Jul-01, to lugnet.trains)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR