 | | A better boxcar? (was: Re: Thanks to Terry Cruse and Ali V. —Ben Fleskes
|
| | | <snip> (...) <snip> ben>> For the longest time I wanted to be 9v complete. Then I finally asked myself why? The one set I was missing was 4554 metrostation and finally saw little motivation for getting a yellow version of the red 2150 retrostation. (...) (26 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A better boxcar? (was: Re: Thanks to Terry Cruse and Ali V. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I'd put any of mine up against theirs. Mine are more US prototypical. I still like my RailBox, and it's almost a year old now. I need to use their parts to do a US prototype... but my non moving doors still look good to me. (even if they do (...) (26 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: A better boxcar? (was: Re: Thanks to Terry Cruse and Ali V. —Dan Parker
|
| | | | Ben Fleskes writes: For the longest time I wanted to be 9v complete. Then I finally asked (...) I must agree with Ben -- and this might be a little more blunt. As much of a LEGO trainhead that I am, I find it difficult to justify building a shrine (...) (26 years ago, 6-Nov-98, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A better boxcar? (was: Re: Thanks to Terry Cruse and Ali V. —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | On Fri, 6 Nov 1998 20:42:39 GMT, "Dan Parker" <danp@qi2.com> wrote: :I must agree with Ben -- and this might be a little more blunt. As much of a :LEGO trainhead that I am, I find it difficult to justify building a shrine to :the 9v series in its (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
