|
|
 | | Re: Santa Fe locomotive - work in progress (Rev 2)
|
| "Mike Walsh" <mike_walsh@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:G6BD5E.9nD@lugnet.com... (...) LGB (...) URL) (...) are (...) some (...) Rev. 2 of my Santa Fe Warbonnet locomotive is now complete. (URL) version is six studs longer than the previous (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) I wonder if thats how 4561 was created :) (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) No, I don't believe I did make that implication. If you drew that inference where it wasn't implied, I'd say that was sloppy, imprecise, non critical thinking on your part. (...) Well, you're certainly the expert from long practice on sloppy (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) <butts in> No way! Even though I don't own *any* train sets, look out for the Raw Material Shifter in the 13-17 category. I don't really think I need those unimportant pieces like wheels or track.. I've found a way around them. (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Three New Train Cars
|
| (...) BUT, when admonishing me for "the next time" I gratuitously mention 8 wide, you *imply* that it was thusly *this* time as well. Sloppy, imprecise language is the bane of clear communication... oh well >;^D Program note: Lar and I are just (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
