|
| | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...)
|
| (...) Krazy Glue. James P (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
| | | | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...)
|
| John Neal wrote in message <38B98A61.71320167@u...st.net>... (...) a (...) trucks and (...) it (...) were (...) are (...) years.... How would you attach a nonLego engine to Lego? (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
| | | | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...)
|
| (...) what (...) continue (...) without (...) And I (...) Clone Brands - are you listening? If LEGO do abandon model trains altogether (save for some token intergalactic attempts at wheeled ICBMs) then the natural course of events will lead to (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
| | | | Re: GATS pictures (and MPGs!), first day
|
| LOL! That lifeguard better stop hitting on the babes and get to work :-) (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains, lugnet.general)
| | | | Re: Bright Future for LEGO Trains? (was Re:No LEGOFest...)
|
| (...) I don't even bother to go to their website. Mr. Justus, are you listening? (...) Excellent ideas, Ben. Makes *perfect* sense. Mr. Justus, are you listening? ;-) (...) Agreed. (...) Even if they cut the line entirely, I could see LEGO trains (...) (25 years ago, 27-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
| |