|
|
 | | Re: Web Page Update
|
| That is a very very kickbutt bridge and the overall scene shows what is possible to achieve. But the quantities required to do a whole layout fully scenic-ed boggle the mind. Nice work, nice work indeed. (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Web Page Update
|
| Thanks, that opening image kinda shows what it's like around our home here, of course the Black Knight is winning the battle :-). The ongoing battle between Lego and Beanies ... but I think I'm winning, I've got the kids playing with the Lego and (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Web Page Update
|
| (...) Nice pages, Thomas. Though that opening page is _scary_. :-) That bridge scene is beautiful, with the waterfall and fisherman. First-rate work. And the detail... the clear 1x1 rounds on the water... bubbles? What are the fish tail pieces from? (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Speculation: Monorail, Disney, Past Coincidence?
|
| On Sat, 16 Jan 1999 00:53:08 GMT, "James Mathis" <jmathis@arctic.nmt.edu> wrote: <snipped> (...) It is interesting. Another possible explanation would be that Disney zealousy guards it's trademarks and, upon learning of a "Disney-like Monorail", (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: Check out my Union Pacific M10000
|
| (...) I have one, but I don't know what it's for. It can't be for coal becuase the engine doesn't have a smoke stack and the book said it was modeled after another diesel engine. In this case, does a tender take place of the cabose? cheers - Barbara (...) (26 years ago, 16-Jan-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
