 | | Re: 1 speed regulator 2 trains and tracks
|
|
(...) Sounds like a fairly intricate scheme - especially if it automatically goes back to work again, instead of requiring you to replace the fuse, which is the usual option. Good work by Lego, I guess. I'll open mine up one time and check :) BTW: (...) (26 years ago, 6-Dec-98, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | 1999 Train 4561
|
|
which is available July 1, seen here: (URL) what Grahame said about it, I was expecting something a bit different. Lego seems to have continued this "futuristic" theme that was started in 4559. It appears to me that this set does NOT use train (...) (26 years ago, 6-Dec-98, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 1 speed regulator 2 trains and tracks
|
|
(...) This comes up a fair bit on a regular basis. Someone needs to write up all that is known and get Matt to add it to his excellent site. Anyway here's what I know. I probably have a 1/2 dozen regulators at this point of various histories (most (...) (26 years ago, 6-Dec-98, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 1 speed regulator 2 trains and tracks
|
|
(...) Well, if you draw too much current thru your regulator, You'll most likely run into the limits of the wall-brick trafo thingy. Whgen that starts to get hot at prolonged use, beware :) Jasper Jasper (26 years ago, 5-Dec-98, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 1 speed regulator 2 trains and tracks
|
|
Not an expert in electronics....I think the regulator adjust to the amount of current that is drawn by the motors so two regulators would share the workload on the same system and if you add more motors on the same regulator it would just feed more (...) (26 years ago, 5-Dec-98, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: looking for review of 4555
|
|
(...) No. Follow up sets where you want replies to go to. For example, suppose you post to lugnet.announce... you ALWAYS need to set the followup to some other group, as announce is for announcements only, not discussion. If it was an RCX related (...) (26 years ago, 3-Dec-98, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: looking for review of 4555
|
|
(...) I was affraid of this happening. Is that what the follow up box is for? Although I have been a registered user for a while, yesterday's posts were my first. I'll get all this stuff down soon. Thanks for the hints. Right now I guess I am a (...) (26 years ago, 3-Dec-98, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 12V FOTW
|
|
(...) According to (URL) 1972-77 4.5V Battery Tender and Red Signal Matt (26 years ago, 3-Dec-98, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | 12V FOTW
|
|
Hi all, Just bought a collection containing 107, 118, 161, 7727, 7740, 7777, 7816, 7824, 7834, five spare 4.5V motors, 7 spare 4.5V flat top wagons 40 lengths of straight 12V track, 4.5V points and crossovers (blue)and many loose pieces. The fellow (...) (26 years ago, 3-Dec-98, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Looking for review of 4555
|
|
(...) I agree with the need for more space between the track and the crane. I found that moving the crane over one stud was enough to give clearance to passing trains. Best is to locate the freight station on a siding and back the train into it. (...) (26 years ago, 3-Dec-98, to lugnet.trains)
|
