|
 | | Re: Monorail roll call
|
| "Jason Spears" <spearjr@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:H3n5vI.598@lugnet.com... (...) insist (...) I'd (...) and (...) look (...) faster (...) Why not automate the monorail start/stops? I made pretty small switcher for our upcoming layout, if (...) (23 years ago, 8-Oct-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
| |  | | Call for expressions of interest: train *operation* get-together
|
| During the train roundtable at NWBrickCon, among other subjects we talked about the possibility of building a layout for realistic operation rather than round-and-round loops for public viewing. Between Vancouver and Seattle, 6 or so people (...) (23 years ago, 8-Oct-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
| |  | | Re: Monorail roll call
|
| (...) As many a Michlugger can attest to, running 3 monorails at one time is a surefire accident in the works. We frequently run 2 or 3 at our shows, and eventually 1 or 2 will end up off the track and on the layout. We try to look out for it, and (...) (23 years ago, 8-Oct-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
| |  | | Re: Monorail roll call
|
| In lugnet.space, Frank Filz writes: ... (...) ... I have to hop about my home layout quite a bit whenever visiting kids insist that I run two monorail trains at a time. I can't imagine the gymnastics I'd require to run four at once. Sounds like fun! (...) (23 years ago, 8-Oct-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
| |  | | Re: Monorail roll call
|
| Added lugnet.trains since it wasn't posted to originally and at least one massive monorail collector is not that much into space (hi Cary!). (...) I'll have to post my track counts later, however, the moon base setup demonstrated that a huge (...) (23 years ago, 7-Oct-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
| |