|
| | Re: Nice Work, Jake!
|
| (...) "Around 8 wide"....as in 14 wide! I love it! And I personally think that each has its own talent area. Large scale is actually much more difficult for me, which is why I am always so impressed with your large scale stuff! And wow, grouped in (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | Re: Nice Work, Jake!
|
| (...) It's a compliment to you both :-). And by the way I agree with your post just prior to the one I replied to. There are two burgeoning "scales" now, or working areas if you prefer. (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | Re: Nice Work, Jake!
|
| (...) I'll take that as a compliment to Jake rather than a slam on me;-) -John (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | Re: Nice Work, Jake!
|
| (...) "Mere"?-- lol Well, of course; that is what I meant by "minifig scale". You, as does James Mathis (good company, I know:), have the ability to pull off a 6 wide version of a loco and still make it look good. It has to do with creative (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | Re: Nice Work, Jake!
|
| (...) Doubtful :-)... he probably saw all the detail and automatically figured it HAD to be 8 wide. (23 years ago, 9-Apr-02, to lugnet.trains)
| |