 | | Re: A study on a train front....
|
|
(...) That is super cool. Brilliant! later, James Mathis (23 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Two questions about My Own Train engine
|
|
Brian kendig wrote in message ... (...) The "without tender" MOT engines have a coal bunker built onto the back, which would be superfluous on an engine with a tender, and also make it impossible to reach out the back of the engine cab to the tender (...) (23 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | SF Registry hits 400!
|
|
Just noticed this morning that the registry hit the 400 mark today, pretty cool. (URL) (23 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Two questions about My Own Train engine
|
|
I've got two questions about the My Own Train locomotive: (1) Why do the 'large engine' instructions give two different designs, one for if you have the tender and one for if you don't? I think the 'without tender' design looks better, but does it (...) (23 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | A study on a train front....
|
|
I came up with a nice simple way to make a train nose. I was playing around with some small 2x2 ramp parts and came up with this design. (URL) looks more like the nose of a tram, but I am sure you all will think of many uses for it. So take a look (...) (23 years ago, 1-Mar-02, to lugnet.trains)
|
