 | | Re: IBLTC
|
|
(...) Count me in, and I agree with James (and your original idea) that IBLTC is the way to go. Has the train nature. ++Lar (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| |
| | Re: GMLTC
|
|
(...) Exactly. However much you got hammered, I think it would have been worse if you hadn't been upfront about it. That's my thinking anyway. (...) Again, exactly right. If the market (interested people) is there, more than one group can be created (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
|
| |
| | Re: Pictures of GFLTC at SMRC Train Show - Feb 24 & 25
|
|
(...) We are working on it, with new web site coming soon and more people wanting to join than I can keep up with. We could become one of the bigger LTC's in the next year. (...) That's cool! I remember talking to Moe at the Tampa show about the (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: ....custom designed train
|
|
(...) All i can say it's a start.I'm hoping it's just the beginning of bigger and better things to come from TLC as far as trains are concerned.There is a long tread on this subject from a couple of days ago here in the trains newsgroup you might (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Pictures of GFLTC at SMRC Train Show - Feb 24 & 25
|
|
Jacob, I have to give Dennis credit for this one. Adding a elevated loose section is a cool idea that I will be trying my self. Build on... Robin W GFLTC (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
