Subject:
|
Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.town
|
Date:
|
Sat, 4 Aug 2001 23:42:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
314 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.year.2002, Bradley Dale writes:
> > FTR, Brad mentioned (at Brickfest) that Castle sets could not be released as
> > long as Lego has the Harry Potter License, just as Space cannot be released as
> > long as they have the Star Wars License (and yes, that means no Classic or
> > Legends).
>
> Why did they stop making Town sets?
If that is true abotu HP and Castle, then that knocks us out of castle and
space and jack stone and juniorization knock us out of Town for some strange
reason, then what's left? I guess there's some reason they can't revive
Pirates and Wild West either, or even the better Adventurer's (which were at
least good for parts, and interesting). Or come up with a good new theme.
I guess my buying will be restricted to bulk, legends/classic and secondary
market.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
| (...) If that is the case with HP, then how did Lego get away with the 10000 legend? I would assume that lego would get a license guite a bit ahead of time before they start actually building HP sets. Jack Stone BETTER not be in the way of town (...) (23 years ago, 5-Aug-01, to lugnet.town)
| | | Re: Top Secret 2002 releases from Anonymous Source
|
| (...) I hope that isn't the case for putting out Town sets, that as long as Jack Stone is out.....I hope Jack Stone is a distant memory by next year....we need real and new town sets....I hope the feed-back site reflex this...our need for new and (...) (23 years ago, 6-Aug-01, to lugnet.town)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
