 | | Re: Town contest voting temporarily closed
|
|
I like the idea of saying that you can't vote for yourself as well. I think we will get better results. Amy Hughes <lugnews@public.atreides.org> wrote in message news:G92q76.7IH@lugnet.com... (...) tend (...) addresses. (...) ballot (...) my (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Town contest voting temporarily closed
|
|
(...) I don't think that entrants for themselves matters all that much. It's the entrants' non-FOL friends that are skewing the results. I don't have any suggestions on how to handle this, except to limit voting to contestants, or have people (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Town contest voting temporarily closed
|
|
(...) Well I can give at least one reason why not being allowed to vote for yourself might be counter productive. For example say there are 5 entrants in a catagory and I feel the following. 1. My entry (can't vote for me) 2. Really cool layout I (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.town)
|
| |
| | Re: Town contest voting temporarily closed
|
|
(...) Hmm... I see what you're getting at. But that's why my g/f's 'selected voting panel' would be good: have Kevin select people who he thinks WON'T do that (I'm sure there are plenty on Lugnet). Or fall to plan b, which is no voting in a category (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.town)
|
