 | | Re: CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP?
|
| (...) The article is not authoritative. Consider just the internal inconsistency of the headline: Lego Halt Use of Some Names with the content. It's not at all clear what is going to be changed _except_ the names of the sets. To which, I gotta say, (...) (25 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Bohrok!
|
| (...) That is probably a coincidence, all 6 names are permutations of a few sounds. Coincidences do occur. The new names make me think of Vulcan... Tuvok anyone? Maybe even, GASP, Turok? Son of stone! that's pohatu to y'all... Turok Son of Stone was (...) (25 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
| | | | | Re: Bohrok Speculation
|
| I dare say that those feet look small enough to fit in the slots underneath the Toa's feet... I like that idea. But how would it work for Pohatu? (...) (25 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
| | | | | Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
|
| (...) Uh... I am reeling. Surely there was a better solution somewhere in the middle. Is this why the video game was cancelled last week? Time to go into denial. Yes, serious denial, and I am not even a Bionicle collector! Of course, there are (...) (25 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Bohrok!
|
| (...) ROTFLMAO! Which one James? --Dave (25 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
|
