 | | Re: MoTeC rule question. —Steven Lane
|
| | | (...) I've never had any problems. (...) I think if we follow this route we should split the competiton into two catagories. Keep the current rules and add a parallel class for models containing modified parts. I realise this would create more (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: MoTeC rule question. —Steven Lane
|
| | | | | I've read all the posts on this subject and in my mind all the arguments reinforce my idea of a two tier Motec. I've had another thought since my earlier post. Purists who wanted to compete against modified models could easily enter the modified (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: MoTeC rule question. —William R. Ward
|
| | | | | | (...) Name suggestion - call the 'modified' category "MoTeC Unlimited". If you're going to allow modified bricks, though, you should also allow MegaBlox and homebrew robotics parts... --Bill. (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: MoTeC rule question. —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | (...) I've gotta disagree here - sometimes finding the best way using modified parts is just as much a challenge as doing it "pure". (Yes, I have used some modified parts - I just don't like to broadcast it!.) So I'd like to see models with minor (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
