Subject:
|
Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Mar 2002 06:44:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
977 times
|
| |
|
|
> > > This is somewhat off-topic but has anyone else noticed that the
> > > background Bi*nicle noise is gone?
> >
> > GOOD!
>
> Sorry to have obtruded on your sacrosanct purview. IOW: nice attitude.
I'm going to have to agree with Kyle on this one. A lot of people here have
been rather snobbish about the whole Bionicle thing. Not just because Lugnet
filed it under Technic, which frankly is where it belongs because Lego put it
there. No, many people are personally offended by its very existance. Between
that and the whole "technic sets don't have beams anymore" whining, it seems
everybody thinks Lego can do no right.
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
| (...) It is a concern that LEGO seams to be doing so many things wrong (not only my opinion, but a reasonable deduction based on their recent financial losses). And I find nothing wrong with people expressing their concerns in this forum. I event (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
| (...) Don’t take it too seriously, despite my jest ((URL) I do own quite few of the sets. I’m happy to give them a place in my little Lego/Technic world. Anyhow, most of the jibes were aimed at Bionicle-heads rather that Bionicle-sets. ;) Scott A (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
| (...) The reason Bionicle and technic should not be in the same group is because thir is no cross-fertilisation between the two. Their is also an age gap between the two products. All that happens is that our respective posts get in each others way (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
| | | Re: Bi*nicle folks went away?
|
| (...) That the two groups are combined is a Lugnet issue. The fact we hate Bionicle is a Lego issue, their two seperate and distinct arguments. The easy test that we're right is that if the two groups had split, no one would bother to argue that (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
44 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
