Subject:
|
Re: Bionicle folks went away?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic.bionicle
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Mar 2002 18:13:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1727 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.technic, Kyle Beatty writes:
> In lugnet.technic, Steven Lane writes:
>
> <quotes snipped>
>
> > I don't read Bionicle posts and I assume they don't read technic one's ...
>
> I am here to tell you that your assumption is in error. I read the Technic
> posts (the ones that aren't screeds about devolution of parts and the like)
> and get much from them.
Well I wasn't expecting 100% absolute conformality wth my word's. You must
be the exception that prove's the rule.
> > ... all this for the sake of mirroring Lego's hierarchy.
>
> That's right. And your point is ... what? That by dint of hating a toy*, you
> should enjoy the privilege of defining Lugnet groups? This is the same as if
> I said, "I hate those [fill in some random steering part**] let's assign
> them to some ghetto somewhere the other side of Duplo.***" Where's the
> "friendly" in that?
>
> If you can't integrate the new parts into your play, that's fine. But it is
> manifestly uncool to try trash my enthusiasm.
Did you actually read my post. I've never trashed your right to enjoy
Bionicle that's an assumption on your part. I don't have to like Bionicle.
My argumets are bionicle is bad for Lego. And their inclusion in our
otherwise pristine group is bad for lugnet.technic. I haven't slagged of any
individual's or interfered with their pastime's, I'm just pro-segregation of
two unconnected discipline's.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Bionicle folks went away?
|
| In lugnet.technic, Steven Lane writes: <quotes snipped> (...) I am here to tell you that your assumption is in error. I read the Technic posts (the ones that aren't screeds about devolution of parts and the like) and get much from them. (...) That's (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
44 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|