Subject:
|
Re: compact designs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:26:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
770 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, William Howard writes:
> When I first built it I couldn't actually see the final shaft turning - then
> i calculated the reduction and stuck a 1x3 lift arm on the end to check that
> nothing was actually slipping. You still need quite a lot of patience to
> see it turn.
>
> William
If the motor is spinning at 350 RPM, then the final output will rotate at
about 0.17 RPM (with a 1:2016 reduction), ignoring friction losses. That's
pretty slow.
If you ignore frictin losses then the torque output will be 1210 ft*lb!
(assuming a motor output of 0.6 ft*lb) If you could fit on a Phillips head,
you could try driving screws into solid wood ;-)
TJ
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | RE: compact designs
|
| (...) head, (...) But don't forget to wear protective goggles - I'd hate to see anyone get one of the 'teeth' of that 14t bevel gear in their eye as it shears under the strain. I reckon in not much more space (as it's sort of L shape looking from (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | RE: compact designs
|
| (...) output (...) When I first built it I couldn't actually see the final shaft turning - then i calculated the reduction and stuck a 1x3 lift arm on the end to check that nothing was actually slipping. You still need quite a lot of patience to see (...) (22 years ago, 1-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
