 | | Re: Roboarm from Dave Baum's super book —Richard Earley
|
| | | Are there plans to make the part models available? -Rich (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Roboarm from Dave Baum's super book —Dave Baum
|
| | | | (...) We haven't decided yet. I'd like to make them available for other hobbyists, but I'm not sure I want to give them away to my competitors if I decide to write another book. We really haven't dug into the legality (or enforcibility) of making (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Roboarm from Dave Baum's super book —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | (...) You just put something to that effect on the license and if anyone violates the liscence then you just sue them. (24 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Roboarm from Dave Baum's super book —Dave Baum
|
| | | | I'm by no means a legal expert, and perhaps I'm being a bit paranoid, but I don't believe its quite that simple. First, I wouldn't trust anything I wrote to actually hold up in a court of law, so I'd need to hire an attorney to write it. One way (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Roboarm from Dave Baum's super book —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | (...) I believe you can still release it under a different liscence. The GPL would be perfect for the job. (24 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
