 | | Re: `Why Britain needs more Meccano and less Lego' —John Barnes
|
| | | Steven Lane wrote; >This would be invaluable for people who wish to comment on Lego but do not >have the experience we enthusiast's have. It should also address the element >of Meccano fans who have a simplistic dislike of Lego. I wonder what the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: `Why Britain needs more Meccano and less Lego' —Steve Lane
|
| | | | | (...) I agree with what John's written although just because we're right doesn't mean we can't tell them we're right :-). We only need to justify ourselve's as much as you'd justify yourself supporting any position. Just enough justification to (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: `Why Britain needs more Meccano and less Lego' —Allan Bedford
|
| | | | (...) Probably over 50... but this is simply speculation. (...) In Meccano's Golden Age, LEGO did not exist. (...) If you compare the top-of-the-line LEGO Technic pieces and building techniques, you won't quite measure up to some of the things that (...) (23 years ago, 22-Aug-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
