 | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Steve Lane
|
| | | (...) There's a simple test, has it got a transparent windscreen, Yes!! then it can't possibly be Technic. Also Technic sets are always built in a skeletal framework style, while the UCS Tie Fighter is a solid form. I thougt we'd agreed Bionicle (...) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Simon Bennett
|
| | | | | (...) Despite being keen for Lego to keep Technic 'traditional' and basically agreeing with you, I can't let you get away with this test. Technic Universal set 8020 has a transparent windscreen and I think it was one of the best value universals (...) (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | | | (...) Yeah, it's a cool set! I like the use of technic functions in small vehicles. There aren't that many technic functions available in the set, but it's still an interesting package. Fredrik (23 years ago, 31-May-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Steve Lane
|
| | | | | | (...) Must be the exception that proves the rule :-( Grumble, grumble. Only joking :-) Steve (23 years ago, 1-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Ray Kremer
|
| | | | | (...) We have agreed on that, several times, but certain parties want to make sure nobody forgets it. Here are the issues as I see them. Should the Techbots (Slizer, Roboriders, Bionicle) be in Lugnet's technic section? Yes, because that's where (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Andy Verner
|
| | | | (...) In other words, almost every Technic Formula 1 racer ever released (not sure whether this includes the Silver Champion) is not actually a Technic set? (...) Well, the main problem with that is that when you get right down to it, nobody really (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Kyle Beatty
|
| | | | <snip> (...) I submit in evidence: (URL) (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —David Arnon
|
| | | | (...) But the question is still open for the rest of them... - David (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Steve Lane
|
| | | | (...) I could write Technic across my butt! it still wouldn't be Technic though. Technic in name only! Steve (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Kyle Beatty
|
| | | | | (...) Oh, I don't know about that. If your butt came out of a press in Billund, it could very well reflect the spirit of Technic. (Technicicity?) But of course, it was LEGO who wrote 'Technic' across the lid-that-is-a-wheel. It's possible to (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Matthew Gerber
|
| | | | | | (...) Ooh! Ooh! That's my favorite Police album! Matt (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —David Arnon
|
| | | | (...) I don't know about you, but (t) at least in my case the main point of my butt is it's functions and not it's looks or anything else, so I guess it is 'Technic' in spirit after all! :-) - David (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Andy Lynch
|
| | | | | Well, thanks for making me laugh out loud in my cubicle at work... :-) -Andy ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Arnon" <arnon@NOSPAMsilicon-value.com> To: <lugnet.technic@lugnet.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:20 PM Subject: Re: (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Bionicle going away? —Andy Verner
|
| | | | (...) O.o I must be a Technic set--my main point has to be my functions, 'cause it sure ain't my looks... -Andrusi && (23 years ago, 7-Jun-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
