| | any info on these new technic 2001 sets?
|
|
has anyone seen pics of, or know anything about either of these new technic sets (which have appeared at Brickset) yet? 8465 Extreme Off-Roader 8466 4WD Off-Roader (URL) will they be junioized or a decent size? Cheers, Chris. (24 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
| | Re: any info on these new technic 2001 sets?
|
|
"Chris Fenter" <chris@i-axis.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:G8K6CK.vu@lugnet.com... (...) technic (...) The correct syntax for the search is (URL) are a decent size, but I cannot discuss them here due to information about them having been (...) (24 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
| | Re: any info on these new technic 2001 sets?
|
|
(...) They look like they are reasonably big but, like all of the current technic sets they are covered in usless technic pannels, ribbed hoses & flexable axles. (24 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
| | Re: any info on these new technic 2001 sets?
|
|
(...) hmmm, i suspect they'll just be bits stuck on a motor base (like the Create-n-Race 4WD X-track). sounds like we'll have to wait a while longer for some more sets with a half decent set of functions... oh well, hope I'm wrong. Chris. (24 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
| | Re: any info on these new technic 2001 sets?
|
|
(...) thanks, Huw, for the tip on syntax - I only figured it didn't work properly once I'd rebooted (presumably what I had copied in only referred back to my temp. cache). Chris. (24 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
| | Re: any info on these new technic 2001 sets?
|
|
(...) just noticed the mention at technic online; if they really do use 8457 tyres, then that sounds like it could be ok. Chris. (24 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
| | Re: any info on these new technic 2001 sets?
|
|
(...) Well, I still haven't got an opinion about those sets, but while the pics were up I have noticed a new gear in the 3809 ROBO GAMERS set. it seems like a '40 Tooth Double Bevel Gear'. kind of a cross between <part:3649> and <part:32296>. (I'm (...) (24 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.technic)
|