 | | Re: I think it's time for a motor grader! Future 8455? too much crane
|
|
"Bastonnade" <TBouvart@aedifica.com> wrote in message news:G7Bxt4.8H5@lugnet.com... (...) Only 955 and 8460 are decent mobile cranes. 8868 is a great set, but doesn't count. 8854? What can I say... (...) No, obviously I don't. As Jennifer said, (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
 | | Re: Bionicle T.V. advertisment
|
|
(...) There isn't any fighting in the advert. It mainly shows the Bionicle in action, while the narrator talks of the legend of Mata Nui. (25 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
 | | Re: I think it's time for a motor grader! Future 8455?
|
|
(...) I'll second this! While I've yet to get the Mindstorms set, electrically controlled pneumatic switches would open up so many possibilities. While it is possible at the moment with various mechanisms, the motor overhead (and size) makes it (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
 | | Re: I think it's time for a motor grader! Future 8455? too much crane
|
|
(...) You cannot have too many mobile cranes. And that's a fact ;-) A grader would be nice - there was one as an alternative model in the first Technic fork lift truck, but it was very simplistic. Jennifer Clark (25 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
 | | Re: Striking Lego Clock
|
|
(...) Jennifer Clark (25 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
 | | New 2001 Technic sets
|
|
Seeing this article news://lugnet.com/G7...lugnet.com it occurs to me that the scans may be illegal dealer catalog scans, so I cancel my previous article. Fredrik (25 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
 | | Re: I think it's time for a motor grader! Future 8455?
|
|
That Komatsu motor grader looks really cool, but it's not the coolest model around. There are Caterpillar and Case graders around, and some older models of graders still around have the ability to swing the blade to either side. This is done by (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
 | | Re: New 2001 Technic sets
|
|
(...) I am going to disagree with you. Speaking as a parent, and a AFOL, I think these sets look quite good for both for parts and play value. I spend a lot of time building RC RCX models now Lego have caught up with me: (URL) A (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.technic)
|
|
 | | Re: New 2001 Technic sets
|
|
(...) Those new dinosaurs are (supposedly) Technic? They're kinda...umm...goofy looking, aren't they? Well, OK, it's just the 'young' ones that are really goofy. The old ones just look like action figures to me - not a whole lotta parts. What are (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.castle)
|
|
 | | Re: 8880 Pleasure...
|
|
Yeah i noticed there is a lot of binding in the drivetrain. It seems to be caused by the Perpendicular Axle joiner that is placed in between the bottom suspension arm on the same axle as the bottom of the shocks.. The shocks are also a bit too long. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.reviews, lugnet.technic)
|