 | | Re: Another Technic Creation
|
|
(...) ..Snip.. (...) Why not have a new Technic range to include models of this complexity? They already have Starter and Advanced, so why not have an Expert range? Martin (24 years ago, 14-Nov-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Creation
|
|
(...) You mean some sort of "Expert Builder" line? :) (URL) (24 years ago, 14-Nov-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Creation
|
|
(...) Exactly, they should bring this back to life. The last set in this line was in 1984, seems they could put more complex models in this range, maybe with a slightly higher recommended age. Maybe they should change the age ratings to a complexity (...) (24 years ago, 14-Nov-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Creation
|
|
(...) Actually, IIRC, "Expert Builder" was a synonym for "Technic", not a classification thereof. I'm sure that if Lego cared to, they could come up with the correct terminology for it; what we want is beautiful, intricate, functional models like (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Creation
|
|
I for one would love to have a set of building directions for some of Jennifer's models, or even the more ingenious sub-assemblies. The would surely lead to improving my creations! And, with all of the AFOL's selling custom creations, maybe someone (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Creation
|
|
Mark Cogan <marq@arttoday.com> wrote in message (...) Clarknic? Techniffer? Techniffer Clarknic? Sorry. Its late. --Jack Gregory (24 years ago, 15-Nov-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Creation
|
|
Jennifer I think you may have achieved Lego Goddess status ;-) Mike PP That is not meant to sound sarcastic BTW. Perhaps just Scottish humour?? (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Creation
|
|
(...) No problem Mike, I know the score ;-) Jennifer Clark (24 years ago, 16-Nov-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
