Subject:
|
Re: Electronic brick (1968) schematics?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains, lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:15:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3628 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Brian Davis wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, Rafe Donahue wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Brian, for providing once again that sick, humbling
> > feeling that I'm now feeling. <sigh>
>
> That's OK, you must have missed the original thread I introduced this on, where
> I directly blamed you for my obsession:
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/technic/?n=16030
Ah ha! Thanks for pointing me back to that thread. You are correct; I had not
seen the whole thing. In reading through it, I recalled reading it when it was
fresh but lost interest when some yahoo screwed up the 3-4-5 right triangle
angle measures...
I'll admit right here that I know nothing of these M and Q and A registers
(sounds like people from a James Bond film) so I'll have to do some more
reading; why can't you people allow me to simply wallow in my ignorance rather
than forcing me to improve my skill set?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Electronic brick (1968) schematics?
|
| (...) Yeah, I understand. The standards on LUGNET have sunk to the point where just about *anyone* can post. I mean just *imagine* getting something as basic as that wrong... sheesh... (...) Funny, my students in my 100-level astronomy class said (...) (16 years ago, 22-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Electronic brick (1968) schematics?
|
| (...) That's OK, you must have missed the original thread I introduced this on, where I directly blamed you for my obsession: (URL) I guess I'll go back to building sets straight out of the (...) Well, that's almost all I did. It's just the box (...) (16 years ago, 22-Jan-08, to lugnet.trains)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
