Subject:
|
Re: Constructing the 8275
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Jan 2008 08:03:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8718 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi Owen,
I do not own this set (yet, I should say ;) ), but this comes as a surprise, as
in most if not all recent sets LEGO went ahead and defined major building
components which were in bags that were numbered accordingly (like "1" for e.g.
the engine, "2" for the chassis and "3" for the body parts - well, we all know
anyway...)
Given so large a set as the 8275, the same scheme would come to mind. However,
the target group is such that it might just be LEGO optimized the bagging
differently and there is merely one major component - the entire model. I will
not be able to tell until the 8275 is finally available again and I can order
mine... (there is, however, this nagging concern about my overstretched LEGO
budget - but I keep repeating myself...)
As a matter of fact, bagging schemes have stepped away from being generally
perceived logical by the average bystander long since...
Jerry
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Constructing the 8275
|
| Hi there. Could anyone who has built the 8275 Motorized Bulldozer figure the bagging scheme used? When I first opened the box, I had expected to see parts bagged by function (i.e. all the gears in a bag, all the axles in another bag, etc). When I (...) (16 years ago, 8-Jan-08, to lugnet.technic)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
