 | | Re: High Failure Rate of New Type 9V Geared Motor
|
|
(...) I'm guessing it may also be cheaper / easier to manufacture. ROSCO (19 years ago, 22-Oct-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: High Failure Rate of New Type 9V Geared Motor
|
|
(...) I suspect it's bad design. Perhaps the way the brushes rub on the PCB as pointed out by Philo ((URL) "This higher friction explains why 43362 stops faster when you give the shaft a twirl, and why its no-load current is higher (9mA vs. 3.5mA)". (...) (19 years ago, 22-Oct-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: High Failure Rate of New Type 9V Geared Motor
|
|
(...) I sent Nathanael Kuipers an email regarding the motors and asked him to forward it to the proper person. Do you think it is excessive torque, excessive use, or just a bad piece design that causes this problem? Nathan (19 years ago, 21-Oct-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Idea Books 8888 and 8889
|
|
(...) Very interesting. Thanks! Keep em coming! (19 years ago, 21-Oct-05, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Gray code vs. Binary
|
|
(...) Haha! I've found a better way to do it, and a better drawing :-) Take my Pick and Place robot circuit: (URL) out the Elbow pistons and switch and connect the Elbow piston inputs to the Wrist piston instead (effectively draw the horozontal (...) (19 years ago, 20-Oct-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
