| | Re: RCX has a fast clock, was Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
|
|
(...) As David Ward suggested me, the oscillator is most probably equipped with a ceramic resonator with built-in capacitors. This explains the low precision of the clock (tolerance for ceramic resonators is in the 1% range while for crystals it is (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | RCX has a fast clock, was Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
|
|
Hello dave, (...) A made an experiment this night using a RCX 2.0, the clock was fast by about 10s per hour. I suppose that this problem comes from bad capacitor loading of the crystal used on RCX. Crystals need to see some capacitance to oscillate (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
|
|
Hi Rob, (...) I tried a similar mechanism (a large inclined plane with a width reduction in the end), the problem is that LEGO balls are somewhat rough, and they tend to form a locked arch above width shrinking. I even tried to add a stirring (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
|
|
(...) Thanks, Bob! I hope you'll get as much pleasure building my arm as I got building your clock... Philo (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Rolling ball clock revisited
|
|
"David Eaton" <deaton@intdata.com> wrote in message news:I8DHDr.u1s@lugnet.com... (...) Not exactly what I was thinking, but you're close. If you stick your bendy straw in your 1/2 pint chocolate milk and then turn it upside-down, that's more of (...) (20 years ago, 7-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
|