Subject:
|
Re: OT: Crane madness
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Nov 2004 00:58:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2725 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Steve Lane wrote:
| |
In lugnet.technic, Tobbe Arnesson wrote:
| |
http://zattevrienden.realroot.be/depanneren.htm
Sorry if this has already been posted, I’m not in the loop anymore (and to
lazy to run a better search).
Regards,
/Tobbe still out there
|
Thats brilliant Tobbe. I thought the first truck looked a bit unstable in the
second picture, and then when I scrolled down I saw it was very unstable
:-).
The operator should probably have lifted over the cab rather than the side,
as the vehicle would have been much less prone to rolling then, although I’d
have thought even a lorry that small would have had outriggers.
|
Lifting over the front can have its problems too if you
ignore the weight chart.
| |
The crane on
the second lorry is massive, it would be the basis of a great model.
|
Sure would.
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: OT: Crane madness
|
| "Ross Crawford" <rosscraw@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message news:I7EIq5.4qF@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) in the (...) unstable (...) side, (...) I'd (...) (URL) ignore the weight chart>. (...) Rembember the crane on the TG-A I have in progress? (...) (20 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: OT: Crane madness
|
| (...) Thats brilliant Tobbe. I thought the first truck looked a bit unstable in the second picture, and then when I scrolled down I saw it was very unstable :-). The operator should probably have lifted over the cab rather than the side, as the (...) (20 years ago, 18-Nov-04, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
