To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 12280
12279  |  12281
Subject: 
Re: Pneumatic Cylinders
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Sun, 4 Apr 2004 19:36:29 GMT
Viewed: 
1879 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Mark Bellis wrote:

Thanks for the info guys.  I have had one or two older pump cylinders that have
lost pressure.  Also, some older yellow cylinders (with square bases) are
difficult to retract from the fully extended position, due to leakage in that
position.  Consequently I decided to tweak the model design to not fully extend
them, especially when they are working as a push-pull pair.  I have also retired
a few old switches due to leakage.

I tested the 8455 pump cylinders as follows:
1. press them with a finger over the nozzle, ensuring lots of resistance.
2. press them fast with a clear nozzle, ensuring no resistance.
3. release them from pressed position with a finger over the nozzle, ensuring no
effect on extension by the spring.

You should also try with another cylinder to blow air into the pump while it is
fully retracted (or being retracted). Otherwise your testing will not reveal a
defective non-return valve.

The air inflow in the pump through the nozzle should be blocked. That was the
problem with my pumps from the 8455. The pressure simply escaped by going back
into one of the pumps.



I test the 8455 yellow cylinders like this:
1. move them with a finger over the outlet nozzle, ensuring lots of resistance.
2. move them with a finger over the inlet nozzle, ensuring resistance, then
release and see how far the cylinder returns under vacuum.
3. repeat 1+2 for the other direction.
4. move them fast with both nozzles clear, ensuring no resistance.  This is
where most of my 8455 cylinders have failed the test.

I have found that to get maximum performance out of the cylinders, both nozzles
of every cylinder need to be bored out with a tiny screwdriver.  None of the
cylinders I have had in 8455s have had completely unblocked nozzles.  Having
bored them out, performance is much enhanced in all cases and I can move them
fast in both directions, with no springback.  Springback is due to a build-up of
vacuum, due to not enough air being able to get into the bottom nozzle when the
cylinder is extended fast, such that there is less air in the cylinder than the
volume swept, and unless you hold it extended, the cylinder will retract part
way as in test 2.

I checked out your info about the grease with my transparent cylinders from
ultimate builder sets.  Yes, there is a build-up of grease below the piston.
When this is spread about by rotating the plunger as you extract and insert it,
the grease can be spread better.  I think grease is responsible for the sticking
of cylinders after not being used for a while.  However I don't think it's the
cause of the more permanent problem of slow airflow.  You're right that a piece
of wire to remove grease from the bottom outlet will improve perfomance, but if
I look into the nozzles of 8455 cylinders I can see that the bore is restricted
by yellow plastic.


Yes, but I must say that the grease alone, can also be the reason for
springback.

I think the improvement in performance given by boring out the nozzles proves
that that was the problem, rather than grease alone.  Do any of your cylinders
have an apparently smaller bore within the nozzles?

I'll have to check that, but right now my 8455-cylinders are tied up in a model.


Tell you what, boring out the nozzles on 100 cylinders gets boring!  I usually
do a few when watching TV.  Notice that the T-junctions have the same bore right
through, so cylinder nozzles should have the same.


Sounds just as boring as fixing the newer train wheels by removing excess
plastic from the frame with a knife.

With the problems I've had with the more complex Lego parts, I am resigned to
testing each one straight out of the box.  At least I've not had to send
pneumatic parts back, unlike the motors (6!), but that's another story.

Mark

I agree, it is a good recommendation to test parts like the pneumatic cylinders
before putting them to use. It can be difficult to switch them afterwards.

Martin



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Pneumatic Cylinders
 
(...) Thanks for the info guys. I have had one or two older pump cylinders that have lost pressure. Also, some older yellow cylinders (with square bases) are difficult to retract from the fully extended position, due to leakage in that position. (...) (21 years ago, 4-Apr-04, to lugnet.technic)

8 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR