 | | New (at least to me) optimal geometry for pneumatically flipped switches —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | I used the same geometry for pistons flipping switches for a long time, but decided to see if I could come up with something better. The new geometries take less parts than my older geometry, and get better range of motion. My old tried and true (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New (at least to me) optimal geometry for pneumatically flipped switches —Mark Bellis
|
| | | | (...) I used the geometry from the alternative model of 8868 crane truck for a long time (this was a bin lorry). However, I found that raising the bottom end of the piston up off the beam that the valve is attached to is a good idea as it helps to (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New (at least to me) optimal geometry for pneumatically flipped switches —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) Hi Mark, Do you have an image of the original geometry, and your modified version? I could not find 8868 on BrickShelf's scanned library. Kevin (...) The new valves are superior in my mind as well. Another plus is they require less parts to (...) (21 years ago, 7-Oct-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: New (at least to me) optimal geometry for pneumatically flipped switches —Tobbe Arnesson
|
| | | | (...) You can find it here (can't direct link due to frames needed for navigation): (URL) klick "By Number" and choose "8800-8899" in the drop-down menu. /Tobbe (21 years ago, 8-Oct-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
| | | | |
