 | | Re: Shocking news from Brickset —Tobbe Arnesson
| | | | (...) I'd say this is the case. But not one of them, probably all of them. Why keep two different cylinders in production? (21 years ago, 19-Sep-03, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Shocking news from Brickset —Stéphane Simard
| | | | | (...) That is certainly reason enough to renumber the set. But, the picture we see is the exact same as set 8431. If they do use the newer cylinder, with this amount of change, it's getting further and further away from the original 8460... (21 years ago, 19-Sep-03, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Shocking news from Brickset —Tobbe Arnesson
| | | | | (...) If they do, this would need to be reworked: (URL) the state Brickshelf is in, I'm glad that site exists, I tend to forget about it) I would not mind though. But if they, say, changed all the Technic beams into the studless type with lot's of (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-03, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Shocking news from Brickset —Stéphane Simard
| | | | | (...) I certainly would mind. First, people will be getting more than enough new-type cylinders with 8455 and any future pneumatic set. Second, it's illegal to have a picture of a toy that differs from what is inside the box; in the picture we see (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-03, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | | |
