To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technicOpen lugnet.technic in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / 11010
11009  |  11011
Subject: 
Re: new pneumatic switch leaks
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.technic
Followup-To: 
lugnet.technic
Date: 
Wed, 30 Jul 2003 03:40:50 GMT
Viewed: 
302 times
  
I've had three QA problems recently that I hadn't had before with Lego.

1) Set #7469 was missing a 1x4 gray brick (used as the base of the gantry
tower) and a page in the instruction booklet required the publication of a
black & white errata supplement page.  Instead of the 1x4 gray brick, a 1x3
gray brick was included instead.

2) Set #2531 was purchased MIB, and when I built it the little truck was
missing a white 1x2 plate.

Anyone know if Lego uses Counting Scales to verify that a set contains the
proper pieces?  I know of a company that sells high capacity scales for
industrial applications that could detect the difference between a 1x4 brick
and a 1x3 brick in a bag of parts going through the assembly line.  Here is
more info (in case Lego is reading this *hint* *hint*):

    http://www.mt.com/mt/filter_link/pf.jsp?m=t&tr=Y4MzU3MzcwMS1Q_D

I've found though that the Lego Replacement Parts people do a decent job of
fixing the errors:


http://www.lego.com/eng/service/faq.asp?id=PartsReplacement&language=2057

The first time I contacted them online, I was reporting a broken piece (a
1x8 gray plate had split on one end) and they sent me a nice letter along
with two replacements (I only requested one).

The second time I filled out the form was for the missing 1x2 - this time
they just sent a piece with no letter.

...and I'm still waiting on my 1x4 brick.


"Stephane Simard" <plague@videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:HItFru.r3E@lugnet.com...
to make a long trial and error process short, I narrowed it down to a
leaky pneumatic switch.


Another example of bad QA by Lego.

I received my 8455 too but for me it's pneumatic cylinder that is
defective. :(



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: new pneumatic switch leaks
 
(...) Another example of bad QA by Lego. I received my 8455 too but for me it's pneumatic cylinder that is defective. :( (21 years ago, 30-Jul-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.technic)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR